Sunday, June 20, 2010

Weather Forecast for London

Click for Londres, Reino Unido Forecast

4th ESO students travelling to London next Friday 25th might be interested in knowing what the weather will be like. Check these sites before packing your suitcases:



Click for Londres, Reino Unido Forecast

Historical Summary for June 25th to June 30th

Temperature

The Average High Temperature is 21 C with a historical range of 12 C to 31 C
The Average Low Temperature is 12 C with a historical range of 7 C to 17 C

There is a 0% chance of a Hot Day (temperature over 90°F / 32°C).
(0 days out of 78 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 0

There is a 99% chance of a Warm Day (temperature over 60°F / 16°C).
(77 days out of 78 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 6

There is a 0% chance of a Freezing Day (temperature below 32°F / 0°C).
(0 days out of 78 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 0

Cloud Cover





Average Cloud Cover is partly cloudy
There is a 42% chance of a Cloudy Day (31 days out of 74 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 5

Wind


The Average Wind is 11 km/h with a historical range of 2 km/h to 26 km/h
There is a 8% chance of a Windy Day (average wind over 10 mph / 15km/h) (6 days out of 78 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 2

Humidity


The Average High Dew Point is 13 C with a historical range of 7 C to 17 C
The Average Low Dew Point is 8 C with a historical range of 1 C to 13 C
There is a 13% chance of a Humid Day (dew point over 65°F / 18°C) (10 days out of 78 in historical record)
Most consecutive days found in historic record: 2



Daily Observations 25th-30th June 2009



2009Temp. (°C)Punto de Rocío (°C)Humedad: (%)Presión al Nivel del Mar (hPa)Visibilidad (km)Wind (km/h)Velocidad de Ráfagas (km/h)Precip (cm)Eventos
Juniohighavglowhighavglowhighavglowhighavglowhighavglowhighavghighsum
2009/6/25262013139888623410181017101210972416-0.00
2009/6/2622181515131288745710141012101110872110-0.00Lluvia
2009/6/27262115161489466321016101410141085235-0.00Lluvia
2009/6/28262115151579462321017101610151096118-0.00Niebla
2009/6/29302417161412885633102010171017---263-0.00
2009/6/30302316151411885731102310201020987198390.00

PlayEnglish for PSP


El 24 de junio se pondrá a la venta «PlayEnglish» para la consola PSP. Desarrollado por Tonika Games, un joven estudio español, el juego pretende enseñar inglés a la vez que divertirnos. Para ello han creado una aventura gráfica llena de humor, pero también de intriga, que atrapa al jugador desde los primeros instantes.
En el juego encarnamos a Jaime Rubio (en inglés, James Blond), un inspector de la Policía española que es enviado a Londres para investigar un robo en la British Gallery. En el transcurso de su investigación, Rubio no sólo deberá superar diversos retos, sino que tendrá la obligación de mejorar su conocimiento del inglés si quiere avanzar en la historia. El juego, avalado por el programa de enseñanza Vaughan Systems, está pensado para jugadores con un conocimiento básico del idioma que quieran mejorar su nivel, por lo que, al transcurrir en inglés, no es adecuado para todo el público. Richard Vaughan, creador del método de enseñanza de inglés que lleva su nombre, afirma que «los conocimientos aprendidos en una hora de “Play -English” equivalen a 10 horas de clase tradicional. Es más, el juego tiene la utilidad de 300 horas de clase debido a la facilidad que tiene para engancharse al mismo». Las consolas portátiles son las que más sufren la piratería. Para evitarla, Sony ha creado una edición especial con la que intentará que el público del juego se decante por ella antes que descargársela ilegalmente.
Así, «PlayEnglish» saldrá con un diseño diferente al del resto de la línea PSP e incluirá contenido especial, como una guía práctica de inglés de 56 páginas, un cupón de descuento para distintos productos de Vaughan Systems y un vale para un viaje de ida y vuelta a Londres. El precio será de 29.99 euros.

Aprender inglés nunca fue tan divertido
Pon a prueba tu dominio de la lengua de Shakespeare interrogando a decenas de personajes con múltiples acentos.



Presentación
¿Problemas con la lengua de Shakespeare? ¿Te aburren las interminables horas en la academia de idiomas? ¿Eres incapaz de estudiar inglés por tu cuenta? Pues no te preocupes más, porque Tonika Games y PlayStation están aquí para echarte una mano. Por eso han desarrollado PlayEnglish, una aventura gráfica con dos objetivos: resolver el enigmático robo de una obra de arte y, por el camino, afianzar tus conocimientos de inglés.
El nuevo título cuenta con el aval de Vaughan Systems, el programa de idiomas lider en nuestro país. A través del argumento del juego, PlayEnglish te irá planteando al usuario una serie de pruebas para las que necesitarás del inglés constantemente si quieres superarlas. Lo bueno es que tú estarás más preocupado por solucionar el puzle que por encontrar las palabras correctas con las que expresarte, así que mejorarás tu dominio del idioma casi sin darte cuenta. ¿Y quién dijo que aprender nuevos idiomas era un proceso sistemático o aburrido?

Historia
Un título tan innovador como PlayEnglish tenía que contar, como no podía ser de otra manera, con un método igualmente revolucionario. Y qué mejor que Vaughan Systems, el método para aprender idiomas que está arrasando en España. Encabezado por el carísmático Richard Vaughan, Vaughan Systems cuenta con una televisión (Aprende Inglés TV), una emisora de radio (Vaughan Radio) y varios libros que tienen una meta común: hacer aprender inglés a la gente sin esfuerzo.
De hecho, según las estimaciones de la empresa, cada hora de juego equivale a 10 horas de clases en una academia. Vaughan va mñas allá, ya que ve en el juego una oportunidad única para "enganchar" a los jóvenes al inglés, de forma que cree que una hora "puede llegar a equivaler a 300, si con ello conseguimos modficar postiviamente su trayectoria de aprendizaje". Así, con las 12 horas de juego que propone PlayEnglish, muchos aprenderán con esta aventura gráfica más inglés del que han asimilado en años y años de clases, cursos e inmersión idiomática. El propio Vaughan cuenta con su propio personaje en el juego, además de haber locutado la mayoría de los textos en inglés, consiguiendo mejorar la comprensión gracias a su reconocible pronunciación.



Mecánica de juego
PlayEnglish es un novedoso método para aprender inglés pero, ante todo, es una aventura gráfica a la antigua usanza. El jugador se pondrá en la piel de Jaime Rubio, aka James Blond, un detective con grandes dotes para la investigación pero un paupérrimo nivel de inglés. Blond es requerido para resolver el robo de una obra de arte en la British Gallery, lo que le obligará a manejarse en inglés para obtener pistas. Juntos, jugador y detective, tendrán que mejorar su nivel de inglés para seguir la pista al ladrón.
La aventura se compone de 15 capítulos, 14 más uno introductorio, que nos llevarán por diversas localizaciones a lo largo y ancho de Europa. PlayEnglish cumple los cánones del género, de modo que el principal método para avanzar será interactuar con los personajes y hacer deducciones por medio del estudio de los escenarios, pero los amantes de la acción no quedarán decepcionados. Para ellos Tonika ha desarrollado una serie de minijuegos y retos que harán ponerse las pilas al jugador, pues tendrán que resolver los puzles en un tiempo límite.
En cuanto a los niveles de dificultad, PlayEnglish cuenta con dos, uno más básico y otro avanzado. La diferencia entre ellos radica en que el segundo será más exigente en lo referente al porcentaje de aciertos y sus locuciones contarán con ruidos que dificultarán la comunicación, como en la vida real. Aunque no es necesario, la comprensión es mejor cuando se utilizan unos auriculares en PSP. ¡Así que más te vale agudizar el oído si quieres encontrar al escurridizo ladrón!

No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Referee Robs U.S. of Goal?

A controversial call during the U.S. versus Slovenia game has Americans crying foul.
“I’m a little gutted to be honest, I don’t know how they stole that third goal from us, and it's too bad, because that was a fair goal I think.” 
“What did you see on the disallowed goal?”
“I saw a good finish and a good goal.” (ESPN)
The American national soccer team is hot after a seemingly phantom foul call nullified the winning goal for the U.S. in its World Cup match against Slovenia.
The Americans went behind 2-0 early, but fought back in the second half to level the score at 2-2. ESPN has what happened next: “And then with the elation and the momentum, controversy here in the 85th minute. It’s a great ball by Donovan. Maurice Edu puts it in goal, but there’s so many questions on the U.S. side — first thing you look for is offside, there’s none there.”
“No, no the referee gave a free kick, and it’s a real injustice, you can see Maurice Edu wins the position in that six-yard box and that should have been a goal.”
But a sportswriter for The New York Times says it might have been a bad call, but the referee didn’t rob the U.S. of the win: “The fact is their comatose performance in the first half... put them in this dreadful hole. The Americans went from disaster to hope in the second half. Then they were robbed. If they had played that furiously from the start, they would not have needed the Edu goal, which was surely legitimate.”
Fox News’ Sheppard Smith is still outraged; and, after mispronouncing two of the U.S. player’s names, takes the opportunity to deride the sport: “Watch that! Clean, no foul, no nothing, if anything, look at that! That’s holding in any sport. The ref called a foul, or something, we don’t even know what it was. So the goal didn’t count, no one’s really sure about any of this, the ref apparently didn’t feel any need to explain anything, one of the weirdities of this, sport.”
A writer for the Huffington Post sees a pattern of unfair calls agains the U.S. in international soccer, and says enough is enough: “Elevate this into a controversy so that everyone knows that the U.S. team feels aggrieved. Not only will that help the psyche of the team — 'us against the world' — it will put the match officials on notice that we are watching...”
So what do you think? Was the U.S. robbed? Or is the team a victim of its own poor play throughout the game?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: France Facing World Cup Elimination

After two games and no goals, France is on the brink of elimination from the World Cup. Coach Raymond Domenech says the team needs "a miracle" to advance.
“The front page headline is ‘Imposters,’ they’re saying that the team is more or less footballing imposters. They were just useless altogether.”
France is staring elimination in the face after failing to score a single goal in its first two games at the World Cup.
Coach Raymond Domenech says the team will need a quote “miracle” to advance beyond the group stage. France’s own captain, Patrice Evra, says France has behaved like a small football nation.
We’re analyzing coverage of France’s poor start to the tournament from France 24, L’Equipe, Le Monde, The Guardian and ESPN.
France lost to Mexico, two nil, and tied with Uruguay, meaning the chances of advancing are very slim. The French sports paper, L’Equipe, notes the disappointment of French fans: “France is contemplating a field of ruins: its national team. ... No sadness, no despair, especially no anger. That would be giving too much to these men who do not know how to give anything.”
France 24 interviews head coach Raymond Domenech: “We have to come out of this tournament in a dignified way. We have to show we can score. At least that.”
But Le Monde says it’s too late for that, and puts the blame firmly on Domenech’s head: "The absence of a chief, of a strategy, of team spirit, of effectiveness, the wasted talent, the neglected resources and, at the end of it, the stinging failure resonates like a cruel metaphor.” 
ESPN notes, this is the same Domenech who took France to the World Cup Final just four years ago. A man who won 63 of his 74 games as national coach: “But this was also a man ... whose bookish appearance, love of the theatre and intellectual style never caught on with the public...His soft-spoken, almost superior way of answering questions was anathema to grass-roots fans...”
The Guardian says, Domenech first lost the fans... then his own players. Against Mexico, it showed: “Blindingly apparent in Thursday's 2-0 defeat to Mexico was that these French players are desperate to reach the end of the Domenech era so they can start afresh under Laurent Blanc, even if that means withdrawing their labour during games.”
Technically there is still a slim chance -- France survives and advances. So what do you think of France’s play? And the French response? High hopes dashed? Or poor sportsmanship?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: 'Toy Story 3': Pixar's Biggest Opening Weekend Ever?

15 years after they first hit the screen, Buzz and Woody are back for another go-around, this time in 3D. 'Toy Story 3' opened Friday to rave reviews.
Toy Story 3 is opening this weekend, and after a summer of so-so box office performances, could it be a huge hit?
Reviews say the movie brings back classic characters and is appealing for both kids and adults. A staggering 100% approval rating onRotten Tomatoes means no one has panned the film yet. Critics are praising the movie for its awesome animation, its humor and its heartfelt themes. It’s even getting Oscar buzz.
MSNBC projects that this could be Pixar’s biggest opening weekend ever — that Toy Story 3 could make $90 to $100 million. A reporter says Disney has set the film up for success, especially in trying to appeal to audiences 15 years after the original came out: “Disney has done a pretty good job of keeping the Toy Story brand around for the last 10 and 15 years by having a presence of Toy Story at its theme parks, re-releasing those DVDS and last fall it re-released Toy Story 1 and Toy Story 2 in theaters in 3-D. $32 million work of ticket sales were sold so it did keep people interested and engaged.”
This is the first Toy Story to be in 3-D, so tickets cost more. Will that deter audiences, or mean a bigger box office take? CNBC points out that Shrek Forever After tried the same 3-D tactic in May, and it didn’t work: “Toy Story 3 and Shrek are similar. Both are digitally animated, popular brands squeezing out third and fourth sequels. And now they are in 3-D, which means a higher ticket price. ... Disney does face the challenge of luring moviegoers back to theaters. U.S. box office is down over 6% since early May.”
The summer box office has been weak so far. The Celebrity Café says similar sequels have proved disappointing: “...many sequels have performed poorly in theaters in recent weeks, including Sex and the City 2 and Shrek Forever After. … While expectations for Toy Story 3 remain high, the current generation of young moviegoers was not around when the first two films...were released.”
But a writer for MTV News says Pixar seems to be a company to count on: “Pixar has done pretty well for itself over the last 15 years. The studio has yet to release a film that failed to hit the $360 million mark.”
So, will Toy Story 3 be a hit now, when the industry needs it, or will it be another summer sequel flop?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Lakers Defeat Celtics to Win 16th NBA Championship

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Boston Celtics in Game 7 to win their 16th championship in franchise history. Kobe won his 5th title, and Phil Jackson won his 11th.
The Los Angeles Lakers won their 16th NBA championship in franchise history, defeating the Boston Celtics in a dramatic Game 7 at the Staples Center in Los Angeles. An HLN analyst describes the intense matchup: “This was like a heavyweight bout in the 12th round with these two guys just going at it. They were both getting tired and more tired. In the end, the Lakers just had more youth."
The Lakers were able to defeat the Celtics after a disappointing loss to them in the 2008 finals. Kobe Bryant was named Finals' MVP for the second year in row and won his fifth NBA title. He didn't have a great night from the field---shooting only six for 24---but was able to grab 15 boards. Luckily for the Lakers, Bryant was able to get some help from his teammates. Pau Gasol had 19 points and 18 rebounds on the night. An NBC Sports writer writes about Gasol's performance: “This was an incredible performance from Gasol, who has probably shed his label as being 'soft.' He was anything but against a smothering Celtics' defense and made some hard-earned shots and free throws down the stretch that helped the Lakers get the win.”
But the unsung hero of the night quite possibly was Queensbridge native Ron Artest. He came through with a magnificent performance to aid the Lakers in their quest for a second straight title. Artest had 20 points, five boards, and five steals. ESPN's Earvin "Magic" Johnson praises Artest on his Game 7 performance: “When you think about all of the bad things that has happened to Ron Artest, and all of the things teams have said bad about him, he really came up big, and I thought he was the difference-maker tonight for the Lakers.
The Celtics led for most of the game, but were unable to pull it out down the stretch. Fox News interviewed NBA Hall of Famer Bill Walton who talked about the Celtics play in Game 7: “The Celtics, they had their chance, they played well enough to maybe get it done, but they ran out of gas. The home crowd--- it wore the Celtics down and the Lakers just came back.”
The Celtics face an off-season of uncertainty, with many players eligable for free agency. The World Champion Lakers look to three-peat next year with the hopes of Phil Jackson returning for another season. If he returns, he will be going for his second three-peat with the Lakers, and his fourth overall, with the first two coming with Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls. So what do you think of the NBA Finals? Epic? Or not so much?
WRITER: Cordell Anderson


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Newsy: Bavaria Brewhaha at World Cup

A Dutch brewery's World Cup publicity stunt has created controversy. But "ambush marketing" seems to work, much to the dismay of its detractors.
“36 women dressed as Danish fans entered the stadium, and then stripped off during the first half to reveal orange mini-dresses. So they looked like Dutch fans after that. They attracted so much attention that a FIFA official came to speak to them, and accused them of ambush marketing, for advertising a beer company that hadn’t paid for the right to be official FIFA World Cup sponsors.”
FIFA orders the arrest of three dozen women -- who’s only crime it seems -- was wearing the same colored dress, and catching the eyes of other fans. But FIFA says, a Dutch beer company paid the women to create a spectacle. And it’s not the first time.
We’re analyzing coverage of what’s being called -- ambush marketing -- from CNN, MarketingWeek, ITN, and The BBC. 
First to the stunt. CNN reports, the beer company, Bavaria, is considered to be a rival to Budweiser -- which actually paid for the rights to be an official sponsor. Bavaria paid to fly the 36 women to the game: “(Reporter) Can you understand why FIFA are protective about their sponsors. (Women) Of course yeah. We understand. There’s no brand on the dress. It’s an orange dress. I show you. There’s no brand, there’s no Bavaria on it. (Reporter) There’s a little label. So, that’s the only clue that you’re from a rival brewery company.”
Little tag or big -- MarketingWeek says, Bavaria has done this before -- for one simple reason: It works: “...over 1,000 Dutch fans wearing branded pants were denied entry to a Holland game during the 2006 World Cup in Germany. The beer brand seems to have benefited from the publicity stunt...after the game and was the fifth most visited beer website in the UK on Tuesday.”
Because of that prior activity, Bavaria was on FIFA’s radar. On The Telegraph, a FIFA official says, this isn’t about what you wear to the games -- so, don’t play us for a fool: “There’s absolutely no issue with you going to the stadium wearing a shirt, or whatever, with a brand, or a competitive brand to a partner here. There’s absolutely no issue whatsoever. What is an issue, is when there is a clear reasoning behind, or action behind, which is an ambush marketing actitivity. That’s all.”
All 36 women were arrested, but two have been held by South African police for a prolonged period of time. Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen (Vare-hagen) tells the BBC, the criminal charges were "disproportionate" to the crime.
"It is outrageous that the two women have a jail term hanging over their heads ... If South Africa or Fifa wants to take a company to task for an illegal marketing action, they should start judicial procedures against the company..."
So, what do you think? Is FIFA going overboard here to protect its sponsors? Or, is the crackdown legitimate?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Man Says He Saw Bigfoot

A self-described North Carolina “mountain man” says he saw Bigfoot.
A North Carolina mountain man is getting big press after saying he scared off Bigfoot, but did he catch a glimpse of the famed creature?
Timothy Peeler called 911 after, he says, he chased Bigfoot away from his house. Peeler said the creature was trying to attack his dogs. Charlotte’s NBC affiliate, WCNC, went to Peeler’s home, where he told the story. He was trying to call coyotes when the creature came.
TIM PEELER: “I tried to call ‘em.
This thing was 10 foot tall. He had beautiful hair.
And I said, ‘Get away from here. Get. Get.’
He looked like he had six fingers on each hand.”
Peeler called 911 at about 3 a.m. AOL News has the audio.
TIM PEELER: It looked like a giant ape with a man’s face. If I shot and killed this beast, this animal, or whatever it is, would I get in any trouble? 
DISPATCHER: I can’t answer that question. 
Peeler said the creature had blondish hair. Creative Loafing compares this to other supposed sightings of Bigfoot: “...footage from other purported Big Foot sightings...only lead to more questions about last week’s sighting...since the beast...is clearly a brunette.”
But there is a history here. Bigfoot sightings have been reported in the area since the late ‘70s, The Charlotte Observer says: “One property owner reported one of his goats died of a broken neck, and newspaper stories from the time report of manhunts – or Bigfoot hunts – by some of the area’s braver residents. Those stories tell of large footprints being found...”
And WTKR, a CBS affiliate in Virginia, says sightings in the area are more common than might be thought, especially in Peeler’s county: “The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization says there have been 57 Bigfoot sightings in North Carolina since 1997, including six in Cleveland County.”
Local police have filed a suspicious persons report in the case, but what do you think? Do you believe in Bigfoot, or is Peeler just another nut?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Newsy: Reaction to Cameron's 'Bloody Sunday' Apology

After a 12-year-long inquiry, the British Government has found that the soldiers acted wrongly and without provocation.
Unjustified and unjustifiable. British Prime Minister David Cameron made a public apology for the 38-year-old massacre known as Bloody Sunday.
On January 30, 1972, British soldiers fired on Republican protestors in Northern Ireland, killing 13 civilians. After a 12-year-long inquiry, the British Government has found that the soldiers acted wrongly and without provocation. (Video: Daily Telegraph)
"The Saville report found the victims were unarmed when the British troops opened fire, some even shot dead while they stood pleading with their hands in the air, or while helping the injured, a very different story to the version of events the troops told of protecting themselves against an armed and dangerous crowd." (ninemsn)
"Some members of our armed forces acted wrongly. The government is ultimately responsible for the conduct of the armed forces. And for that, on behalf of the government, indeed, on behalf of our country, I am deeply sorry." (FLASH TO GUARDIAN) "There is no doubt, there is nothing equivocal, there are no ambiguities. What happened on Bloody Sunday was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong." (The Guardian / Telegraph)
The apology came after the release of a report by Lord Saville, the result of a 12-year-long investigation started by Tony Blair in 1998.
But today, an article in the Guardian says the report's findings leave many unanswered questions: "... how did they sift the evidence? What evidence did they leave in, or out? What did the secret services redact? Why did he take so long?"
Mr. Cameron says the soldiers involved could face trial. But on the BBC, Stephen Pollard, an attorney for the soldiers, says he's confident they won't.

REPORTER: "This does open the door, does it not, for certain criminal prosecutions?"
POLLARD: "No, it doesn't."
REPORTER: "Why doesn't it?"
POLLARD: "Because firstly, Lord Saville's conclusions as to his certainty of identifying the individual soldiers fly in the face of most of what we've heard, and secondly-"
REPORTER: "Are you saying he cherry-picked the evidence?"
POLLARD: "I am saying he cherry-picked the evidence, yes."

What do you think? Is Britain's apology for Bloody Sunday long-overdue, or should the evidence be reevaluated?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only

(Sunday) Bloody Sunday

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron has apologised for the actions of British soldiers after the "Saville Inquiry" found that 14 civil rights demonstrators and bystanders were killed without justification.
Describing the actions of soldier as "unjustified and unjustifiable", the Prime Minister told the Commons: "What happened should never ever have happened. I am deeply, deeply sorry."
The Bloody Sunday Inquiry report found that all those killed were unarmed and that paratroopers had lost control and opened fire without warning. Some had been trying to flee when they were hit and soldiers had made up false accounts in a bid to cover up their actions, the report found.
A total of 13 unarmed civilians, seven of them teenagers, died in Londonderry when soldiers from 1st Battalion, the Parachute Regiment opened fire during clashes after the banned march was stopped from entering the city centre on January 30 1972. A 14th man died some time later from his injuries.
Lord Saville concluded: “What happened on Bloody Sunday strengthened the Provisional IRA, increased nationalist resentment and hostility towards the Army and exacerbated the violent conflict of the years that followed. Bloody Sunday was a tragedy for the bereaved and the wounded, and a catastrophe for the people of Northern Ireland.”
The inquiry found that the soldiers of the support company who went into the Bogside, where the march was taking place, did so "as a result of an order which should not have been given" by their commander.
It concluded that "on balance" the first shot in the vicinity of the march was fired by British soldiers.
None of the casualties was carrying a firearm and while there was some shooting by republican paramilitaries, "none of this firing provided any justification for the shooting of civilian casualties".
In no case was any warning given by the soldiers before opening fire and the support company "reacted by losing their self-control ... forgetting or ignoring their instructions and training".
The result was a "serious and widespread loss of fire discipline".
Afterwards, many of the soldiers involved "knowingly put forward false accounts in order to seek to justify their firing".
After a night of anxious expectation in Londonderry, bereaved relatives celebrated the report's conclusions at the Guildhall, giving thumbs up to crowds outside.
The £191 million Saville report included 30 million words of testimony and took 12 years to complete.
Lord Saville has been criticised for the length of his inquiry, which was expected to last two years when it was ordered by Tony Blair in 1998.
Nearly 1,000 witnesses gave evidence, including soldiers, civilians, police, politicians, forensic experts, journalists, civilians, priests and members of the IRA, including Martin McGuinness, the Northern Ireland’s Deputy First Minister.

Sunday Bloody Sunday is the opening track from U2's 1983 album, War.  "Sunday Bloody Sunday" is noted for its militaristic drumbeat, harsh guitar, and melodic harmonies. One of U2's most overtly political songs, its lyrics describe the horror felt by an observer of The Troubles in Northern Ireland, mainly focusing on the Bloody Sunday incident in Derry where British troops shot and killed civil rights marchers. Along with "New Year's Day", the song helped U2 reach a wider listening audience. 
The song has remained a staple of U2's live concerts. During its earliest performances, the song created controversy. Bono reasserted the song's anti-hate, anti-sectarian-violence message to his audience for many years. Today, it is considered one of U2's signature songs, being one of the band's most performed songs. Critics rate it among the best political protest songs, and it has been covered by over a dozen artists. It was named the 268th greatest song by Rolling Stone on their list of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time.
U2's drummer, Larry Mullen Jr said of the song in 1983:
"We're into the politics of people, we're not into politics. Like you talk about Northern Ireland, 'Sunday Bloody Sunday,' people sort of think, 'Oh, that time when 13 Catholics were shot by British soldiers'; that's not what the song is about. That's an incident, the most famous incident in Northern Ireland and it's the strongest way of saying, 'How long? How long do we have to put up with this?' I don't care who's who - Catholics, Protestants, whatever. You know people are dying every single day through bitterness and hate, and we're saying why? What's the point? And you can move that into places like El Salvador and other similar situations - people dying. Let's forget the politics, let's stop shooting each other and sit around the table and talk about it... There are a lot of bands taking sides saying politics is crap, etc. Well, so what! The real battle is people dying, that's the real battle."



No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Best students - 2009/10 3rd Term



Our best students of English during the 3rd Term have been:
1 ESO A - Íñigo Alcubierre Clemente (Best student for the 2nd time this schoolyear) & Gabriel Mtnez. Gcía. (7.91)
1 ESO B - Adrián Alonso Núñez (9.18) Best student for the 2nd time this schoolyear
2 ESO A - Yasmina El Hachimi (9.49)
2 ESO B - Miguel Romero Zapatero (9.46) Best student for the 3rd time this schoolyear
3 ESO A - Christian Collazo Román (8.14)
3 ESO B - Alejandro Otero Fdez. (9.25)
4 ESO A - Sara McGarry Arena (9.18) Best student for the 3rd time this schoolyear and she has also improved her 1st and 2nd terms performance!
4 ESO B - Reyes Moreno Fernández (7.91) 
Very often the students who get the highest grades are not the most talented ones, but those who try harder, show a positive attitude and have a praiseworthy work ethics.
Have a very happy summer and CARPE DIEM!!!!!
Congratulations!


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Microsoft Unveils 'Kinect'

Microsoft showed off their new and improved XBOX 360 at the E3 expo. Also released was XBOX Kinect, an entirely new form of entertainment.
“When they wiggle their arms around when they jump when they actually see the direct reaction on screen to their persona on screen…you realize you are bringing a whole new form of entertainment to the home. (Music) It's full body game play and its really about getting up, having fun, and playing the way you know how to play.” (USA Today)
Microsoft unveiled its latest gaming product Kinect, formerly called project Natal. The gaming device works with an improved XBOX 360 and is the first system to be completely hands free - controlled only by voice and body movements. In a struggling gaming market many wonder whether the new device can be successful.
We are analyzing coverage from USA Today, The BBC, CNET, and ZDNet.
A technology correspondent for the BBC shows us how the new sensor works – and says developers need it to be successful: “It all depends on this, the sensor that has 3 cameras built in. What it does basically is know where the player is and in effect your whole body becomes the controller. … This is developed by a British developer, rare, and they are all desperate for this to work because an ailing games industry really needs something new to get it moving faster.”
But the sensor does more than just games, it's also a social platform and an entertainment device. CNET brings coverage from Microsoft’s unveiling - which shows some of the innovative features: “Alright now I want to show you my favorite scene, All I have to do is bring my hands up, move it a little to the left… (Applause) It’s simple, its natural, and effortless – that’s how easy it is to control Zune movies with Kinect on Xbox 360. Now what I can do with my hands is just as easy with my voice. XBOX Pause. Now that is pretty slick, right?”
A blogger for ZDNet says Microsoft has the market for the console and compares it to the Nintendo Wii. He says - the game developers - will ultimately make or break the new console: “But does any of this advantage translate into Kinect being a winning product? No. Only one thing does, the games. … What Nintendo did with the Wii was carve out for itself a niche... It worked. What Microsoft is trying to do is a similar thing, only three and a half years later.”
The negative reviews for Kinect say the games experience a bit of lag between movements.
The new XBOX console and device will be released to the public in November with 15 games.
So what do you think? Hit or miss?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Should Vuvuzela Horns be Banned at World Cup?

World Cup officials consider a ban on a popular noisemaker, but fans worry it would mean an end to a beloved South African tradition.
"Mexico has its wave, Brazil has its samba bands and South Africa has ... a bright, plastic horn. Charming cultural idiosyncrasy or trumpet from hell?"(Telegraph)
They're called vuvuzelas, from the Zulu word meaning "to make noise." And for many players and broadcasters at the World Cup, that's the problem. World Cup officials are considering a ban on the South African tradition after receiving complaints the horns are simply too noisy.
We're analyzing coverage from ESPN, CTV, Al Jazeera, euronews, Allafrica and the Telegraph.
Soccer stars like Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo and France's Patrice Evra are calling the horns a major distraction on the field. Numerous YouTube videos by fans label them annoying. And on ESPN, commentators Mike Greenberg and Mike Golic complain about the constant noise: "One thing that I found — I don't know if I'm the only person — that I found excruciating was this constant droning that was going on. They're blowing these trunpet-looking horns ... and it never ends."
On Canada's CTV, reporter Lisa LaFlamme praises bans on the vuvuzelas already in place: "They have banned them in the last four days, they've been banned from shopping malls. I was in shopping malls when they weren't banned, and trust me, it's a good thing they were banned in the shopping malls. They've been banned during the playing of the National Anthem inside the stadiums."
The South African coach says the horns provide moral support for his team, equivalent to a 12th man on the team, according to Al Jazeera. African fans oneuronews and Al Jazeera agree the vuvuzelas are essential to the game: "They want to ban them… why? This is an African World Cup and it belongs to us. We must shout the vuvuzela, why not? You must blow and blow and blow till the end of the World Cup."
"The vuvuzela symbolizes the difference between South Africans and other countries. It shows us that we are different, we are unique. "
The noise complaints of others are valid, though, according to an official for hearing aid company, Phonak. The company recently conducted tests on the vuvuzelas and discovered damaging effects: "... noise levels were between 113 and 131 decibels ... extended exposure at just 85 decibels puts us at a risk of permanent noise-induced hearing loss. When subjected to 100 decibels or more, hearing damage can occur in just 15 minutes." (Allafrica)
FIFA's Rich Mkhondo says the vuvuzela tradition is important to South Africa and an outright ban is unlikely, despite the noise levels: "The history of the vuvuzela is ingrained in the history of South Africa, and if you go back in history you will find they emanate from the horn, which was used by our forefathers in committees. Similarly, the vuvuzelas for the games are used as a way of expressing their feelings about the game itself." (Telegraph)
So what do you think? Should the vuvuzelas be banned? Also, if you'd like to see a demonstration on the art of vuvuzela blowing, watch this video.


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

World Cup South Africa 2010: K'naan & David Bisbal - Wavin' Flag

The official video of the FIFA World Cup South Afrika 2010
Give me freedom! Give me fire! Give me reason! Take me higher!!
Make sure you click on the CC button (Closed Captions) to get the subtitles going or click on "Interactive Transcript" icon if you want to sing karaoke style:



No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Humour (but real): David after the dentist

Poor David has been to the dentist and now he is feeling funny...


This is the transcript:

David: Surgery...
Dad: Yeah, I know.How did it go?
David: I didn't feel anything.
Dad: Yeah...
David: Oooh, I feel funny.
Dad: It kinda felt good, didn't it?
David: Ooooh... Is, is this real life?
Dad: Yes, this is real life.
David: Okay now? Okay now? I have two fingers...
Dad: Good!
David: Now, four fingers.
Dad: Four fingers?
David: Nah, ah, ah!
Dad: Don't put that in. Don't put it in your mouth. Okay? You feel good?
David: I can't see anything.
Dad: Yes, you can. Stay in your seat.
David: [loud scream] I don't feel tired.
Dad: You don't?
David: Uh, uh.
Dad: No?
David: Do I have stitches?
Dad: Uh huh.
David: Do, do I have stitches? Dad: Yes.
David: On my teeth?
Dad: Yeah, Don't touch it...Don't!
David: Why can't I touch it?
Dad: Because it'll mess up the stitches...
David: You have four eyes.
Dad: Yeah...
David: I feel, I feel funny. Why is this happening to me?
Dad: It's okay, Bud. It's just from the medicine. Okay?
David: Is this going to be forever?
Dad: No [chuckle], no. It won't be forever.
David: Ach.
Dad: [laughing]

No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Newsy: Green's Gaffe Gives Media a Field Day

England goalkeeper Robert Green is the center of attention after his error gifted the U.S. a goal. The British media is making a mockery of the keeper and the U.S. is quick to notice.
“Dempsey, Oh and Robert Green's let it in. It’s a howler. … The man in the green in the jersey, that man with Green on the name of his shirt has given away one of the softest goals you will ever see at this level of football.” (ABC)
In England they are calling it a howler, and in the States an early Christmas gift. The immediately infamous gaffe goal is stealing headlines around the globe.
We're examining reactions from the Daily Mail, News of the World, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The Wall Street Journal, and more.
First to England, where the coverage varied from harsh to uplifting. Some articles say the squad is backing their keeper, but the tone in others is much worse.
“The Daily Mail writes: ‘Calamity! Robert Green Faces England Axe Howler Hands Americans Draw.’
The most talked about headline was from News of the World, which dubbed it the ‘Hand of Clod' and Stars n’ Tripe’
And The Sunday Times says: ‘Green Fingers – One Disastrous Spill the Yanks Won’t Complain About’
U.S. media was quick to analyze the UK’s coverage.
New York Daily News Headlines: ‘God Save the Green! British newspapers tear into Goalkeeper Robert Green.’”
“Yahoo! Sports says: ‘Hand of Clod- Press Slams Green for Blunder’
The Wall Street Journal writes: ‘English Papers Turn Green With Ire’
Green spoke with the media after the game and apologized. Here he is with the Telegraph: “It was a horrible mistake. It was a genuine mistake, an honest mistake. And as I said to the other guys in the media, it's how you bounce back from the mistake.”
According to The Sunday Times and the Telegraph, Green is bouncing back by playing golf on Sunday. Multiple outlets are reporting that England is considering switching keepers.
That might not be a bad move considering this wasn’t Greene’s first flub. According to Opta, a sports statistics tracking service, Green is known for making errors: “Rob Green made more errors leading to goals than any other player in the Premier League last season. Calamity.”
So what do you think? Is the coverage harsh or justified? And should England switch keepers?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Humour: Why Do We Have Earwax?


This one is dedicated to 4th ESO student Víctor Otero:


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: 16-Year-Old Sailor Found Alive

Following in her brothers footsteps, Abby Sunderland attempted to sail around the world alone. She became stranded and had to signal for help. Critics are questioning the parents.
“Abby Sunderland is alive and well ... Search and rescuer crews spotted the 16-year-old and her boat early this morning in the Indian Ocean hundreds of miles from land. The boat was still upright in the water but the mast and sail were broken.” (WCBS)
Sunderland was attempting to become the youngest person to sail around the world solo. That was before she encountered 30-foot swells and high winds. And now many critics are wondering if she was too young to attempt the feat.
We are analyzing coverage from WCBS, ninemsn, ABC and The Herald Sun.
First, to Australia's ninemsn — the controversy continues, even though Sunderland has been found.: “People had been very critical of this even before Abby set off on this adventure. One very well respected critic here in Los Angeles likened it to some type of child abuse.”
“They are endangering their rescuers in the southern ocean in the middle of winter. I mean, its great that we have these adventurers out there, but when they go out and do stupid things, and this is stupid, they are endangering the rescuers.”
Sunderland’s father, who was obviously supportive, defended his daughter's voyage and told ABC News that everyday activities can be just as dangerous: "How many teenagers die in car accidents every year? … Should we stop them from driving a car?"
But one British sailor quoted in The Herald Sun says sailing around the world at 16 is too young and now it's just a popular trend: "…being the youngest to sail around the world has become the fashion at the moment… When are we going to get 14-year-olds saying 'I want to do it?'"
So what do you think? Should Abby’s parents have allowed her to set sail? 


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: World Cup a Turning Point for Africa?

The stage is set for the worlds largest sporting event, the World Cup. This year to be held in South Africa. And as many are pointing out, this may be a turning point for the nation and the continent.
There has been much anticipation and preparation leading up to the opening match, and the host nation is in full World Cup fever.
As a writer for the Christian Science Monitor points out, this is a South Africa that the world hasn't seen before: "The South Africa that will go on display this month is a country that has completed its transformation from a racist pariah state into a multicultural majority-led state, with many of the accouterments of a European first-world powerhouse. It is a country that has achieved much in little time."
Six African nations are set to compete in the tournament and have an entire continent's hopes on their backs.
But a Malawi writer for the Huffington Post says it doesn't really matter if an African team wins the world cup or not, because the continent as a whole has already won: "Africa will win, in ways that are incalculable... In ways perhaps coming generations might look back and thank us for. ... [W]here different people across the country look towards the camera and smile and say 'I was there.'"
The author of bestseller "Invictus" agrees, telling Al Jazeera, change will come... just not overnight: "Whatever is gonna to happen in this country, for better or for worse is gonna be gradual. There isn't gonna be some instant boom, but I think a sense of national pride, a sense of hope, a sense of you know we did the World Cup, we are potentially a world class nation is something which can infuse, can provide a new energy for the country."
But Kenya's Daily Nation says, no matter how long it takes, this event will make history for Africa. The magazine quotes one of South Africa's former presidents, Thabo Mbeki: “We want, on behalf of our continent, to stage an event that will send ripples of confidence in our land. We want to ensure that one day historians will reflect upon the 2010 World Cup as a moment when Africa stood tall and resolutely turned the tide on centuries of poverty and conflict.”
So what do you think? Will the World Cup be Africa's turning point?
WRITER: Kelly Chase


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Friday, June 11, 2010

4th ESO Trip: Hotel in London - Equity Point London Paddington


4th ESO students, Equity Point is the hotel where you are going to stay for your school trip to London from Friday 25th to Wednesday 30th June.

Location is key
Since last March, the new Equity Point hotel in London is a reality in the high-end Paddington neighbourhood, next to the train station, where the Heathrow Express connects the main London airport with the city centre in 15 minutes. You can enjoy Hyde Park, the green heart of the city, just 5 minutes away, or the magic of nearby Notting Hill.




Georgian style
The Georgian style building, with its characteristic entrance flanked by white columns and typical windows of this architectural style, has 68 en suite rooms distributed over 7 floors, which offer our guests the choice of many different types of completely renovated rooms: from doubles to 8-bed rooms.

 


And let's not forget about the importance of the community areas
Community areas with TV and Wi-Fi, cutting-edge internet technology, bar and kitchen for the hotel guests to use, wheelchair accessibility and lockers for each bed, etc. are some of the facilities made available for the traveller staying in the new Equity Point hotel in London.

 

Important
It will be required to show any oficial ID with photo at your arrival.
Persons under the age of 18 years are only allowed to stay in private rooms or dormitory rooms that are booked for use of one family or group of persons, and cannot share dormitory rooms with other guests. People under 18 years old must travel with their parents or legal tutor.



How to get there
From London Train Stations or any underground stop:
Central Line: take the underground and get off at Lancaster Gate station. Exiting the station to the left, turn left at Westbourne Street. Westbourne Street becomes Sussex Gardens then Westbourne Terrace. Go straight until number 100-102 Westbourne Terrace.
Circle Line / District Line/Bakerloo/Hammersmith/City: take the Underground and get off at Paddington Station. Exit the station onto PRAED STREET. Turn RIGHT and continue straight. PRAED STREET becomes CRAVEN ROAD. Turn right at Westbourne Terrace and go straight until number 100-102 Westbourne Terrace.
Transport planner: www.tfl.gov.uk

From Heathrow Airport
Follow the signs in the airport until you reach the Heathrow Express boarding platform. Board the Heathrow Express, which will take you to Paddington Station in 18 minutes. Exit the station onto PRAED STREET. Turn RIGHT and continue straight. PRAED STREET becomes CRAVEN ROAD. Turn right at Westbourne Terrace and go straight until number 100-102 Westbourne Terrace.
From Gatwick Airport
Follow the signs indicating the Gatwick Express train. Take this train until you reach Victoria Station (45 minutes). Switch to the London Underground and board a Circle line train towards High Street Kensington Alight at Paddington Station. Exit the station onto PRAED STREET. Turn RIGHT and continue straight. PRAED STREET becomes CRAVEN ROAD. Turn right at Westbourne Terrace and go straight until number 100-102 Westbourne Terrace.

Equity Point London Hotel:
100-102 Westbourne Terrace
Paddington
London
England
W2 6QE
United Kingdom
Tel: 00442070878001
No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Carpe diem. Seize the day, kids. Make your lives extraordinary

Dear 4th ESO students,
Your time at Labor School is coming to an end. We would like to give you some pieces of advice and, unlike many other times when you have been given some recommendation, just for once we hope you will pay heed to these wise words ;-):

SEIZE THE DAY. MAKE YOUR LIVES EXTRAORDINARY


Carpe diem is a phrase from a Latin poem by Horace. It is popularly translated as "seize the day". Carpe means "pick, pluck, pluck off, gather", but Horace uses the word to mean "enjoy, make use of." In Horace, the phrase is part of the longer Carpe diem quam minime credula postero – "Seize the day, trusting as little as possible in the future", and the ode says that the future is unknowable, and that instead one should scale back one's hopes to a brief future.


Dear Students: You define us. Make us feel proud.


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Friday, June 4, 2010

Golf or Curling?

Has Tiger Woods really quit golfing to take up curling?


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

Newsy: Does 'Kick-Ass' Cross the Line?

A new superhero movie is breaking all the rules, and critics are lining up to pan it. But it may "Kick-Ass" at the box office just the same.
"And the audience that will never go watch this movie are the ones that are complaining about it, so, no offense to them, you don't have to go buy a ticket, don't go see it." (CNN)
That's Matthew Vaughn, director of the soon-to-be-released movie "Kick-Ass." It's a movie that has broken all the rules accordiang to media critics and is redefining edgy.
We're taking a look at the movie with Fox News 411, New York Magazine, the L-A Times, CNN and NPR.
First to Fox News 411 describing the movie's heroine: "And the role of hit girl is a 12-year-old assassin out for revenge. She shoots, slaughters and strangles people while donning a superhero costume. She also curses using the f-bomb and c-word. Has Hollywood gone too far this time with a child actor?"
New York Magazine's David Edelstein says "Kick Ass" appeals to our sleazy side. Starting with the movie's heroine, the 11-year-old pixie who calls herself—"Hit Girl"—cursing and killing with joyful aplomb: "There’s a disconnect when you watch: Should a girl this age—the actress herself, say—be allowed even to see this thing? Is what’s onscreen a form of child abuse? Do we splutter in outrage or relax and dig the Grand Guignol spectacle?"
The L.A. Times Steven Zeitchik says, the more movie critics and family advocates spout off against "Kick-Ass"—the bigger it could grow: "If Lionsgate plays its cards right, protests will come flying in over Hit Girl's language and action. ...if the Parents Television Council didn't like an implied threesome on "Gossip Girl," we're not quite sure how they'll feel about...many of the seven words you can't say on television...in a movie about and aimed at teenagers."
The actors in the movie tell CNN—don't take it so seriously: "It's not real life, so if they can separate the two between work and not, then I don't see what the problem is. This is fantasy. This is a movie. You go there to escape so don't take it so seriously (laughs): "They're all silly. It's just a movie. They got nothing to worry about."
NPR's Kenneth Turan says, love or hate hyperaction violence, this movie is the pentultimate: "It may or may not be the end of civilization as we know it, but "Kick-Ass" certainly is Exhibit A of the here and now."
"Kick-Ass" opens in select theatres this weekend. To see a trailer for the movie be sure to visit our transcript section.


No copyright infringement intended. For educational, non-commercial purposes only.

English Tests, Exams and Deadlines

Find us here

CBBC Newsround | Home